Legalizing weed

THESIS STATEMENT legitimateizing ganja proves to flip more(prenominal) beneficial effectuate or consequences on our fraternity as a whole than banning it, as could be prove by opposite countries wherein purchase of marihuana is decriminalized.Legalizing ganja had been one of the intimately controversial issues on m all told societies. Marijuana could be obtained from a comprise named cannabis sativa. Marijuanas virtually dynamic element is delta tetrahyddrocannibino or only THC. THC is the one responsible for the charge wad gets elevated formerly they mathematical functiond hemp. Marijuana is called in a human action of slip office such as grass, mary jane, smoke, pot, weed, etc. Most tidy sum have certain con nonation that ganja is something which is bad and injurious. Most think of ganja as nonhing but illegal drugs. However, hemp also has its medical exam recitations which would be discussed later on this paper. There is also wide ordinate tactu al sensation that marihuana could either make or break a soul. If cannabis is used on medicinal purposes only then the results atomic number 18 considered helpful but when used for other reasons then the result would be perverting. These claims would all be tested on this paper. The main question would be whether legalizing cannabis would name more positive or negative effect on the individuals using it as well as on the friendship as a whole.ARGUMENT ON LIBERTYM some(prenominal) mess condemn the use of ganja be gravel of its wrongful effects on the society as well as on the individuals living in that particular society. It is basically because of the peoples fear of the harmful consequences of marihuana on which they argue that cannabis sativa be banned. The nullifyion of using marihuana is often supported with claims like legalizing it would cause serious harm on our society in particular on three-year-old adults. There ar claims that most people under the durati on of 18 may have open access on cannabis. Another component is some people beliefs that correct people whose 18 years of age and above often do not know the consequences of their actions and therefore they could not decide for their own selves. There are claims that continuous use of marijuana would result to violence and in this regard marijuana rattling ought to be banned.First and foremost, an argument using John Stuart Mill as well as the liberals point of view regarding freedom is out-of-pocket on this paper. Mill potently believes that the severalise as well as the other people does not have any right whatsoever to interfere with other peoples businesses unless the said peoples activities prove to be harmful on the society or on other individual. Not simply because other people finds one action to be offensive or not to that persons liking it already follow that that person has a right to limit or to prohibit other people from doing exactly what they please. For one, P erson A may not find marijuana to his liking and indeed vow to never use it, however, not simply because Person A does not like marijuana it already follows that he could prohibit Person B from using marijuana.The state could also not intrude on Persons Bs freedom to smoke marijuana provided that Person B does not cause the state or the states individual any harm. There are arguments which state that most people who use marijuana gets hot and thus marijuana should be prohibited. In a way marijuana could be likened to alcoholic beverages. There are people who scat to get violent once they get drunk but most people often just go home after crapulence and then they go to sleep. Thus, if alcohol could be legalized then why is it that marijuana ought to be banned? Violent person tends to get more violent once they get drunk, and such is also the case with marijuana. Marijuana makes a person feels high but it does not make a person violent as long as you are not inherently a violent person.ARGUMENT ON COST AND FAILUREOn terms of cost to the governing there are people who believe that once marijuana is legalized a lot of people would have open access to the drug thus heightening the likelihood that more people would have to go to replacement centers in order to cure them of their addiction. These people argue that expenses used on rehabilitation centers are supported by peoples taxes thus legalizing marijuana would be an additional burden for the rest of the society. However, these arguments do not truely prove to be valid, and often they are found to be unsupported or based on very shaky causal agent of argumentation added to the incident that prohibition of the use of marijuana is not really effective.Most countries and individuals do not really support the legalization of marijuana especially since they consider marijuana as harmful. Marijuana may be harmful but so is cigarette and alcohol and yet cigarettes and alcoholic beverages are legal for use. Wit h the endless efforts of the regimen to hunt or to track cumulus people who uses and who traffic marijuana on the country peoples taxes just go to waste. In contrast to the arguments of those who are not in favor of legalizing marijuana on the basis that rehabilitation centers costs a lot and is a burden to the society as a whole, pro legalization of marijuana would argue that the endless efforts of the government and of other individuals to prohibit the use of marijuana is what really costs a lot of bills.The endless campaign against drugs, the imprisoning of skillful people who just happened to like using marijuana in nastiness of their being peaceful, these are all a waste of time and money. Compared to other drugs marijuana is not that harmful and marijuana is just as addicting as cigarettes and alcohol yet these two are not prohibited by the government (Weinstein, 1999). Besides, if we would look at it in a certain way we would see that everything around us is indeed harmfu l once interpreted in excess. For one, high caloric foods got harmful effects on our physical structure yet they are not banned. In a way marijuana is just like those foods with high calorie, and excess use of it could have harmful effects on ones body yet when it comes to eating the government does not really imprison people who eat in excess.Aside from that instead of wasting the governments resources as well as the peoples taxes on chasing marijuana sellers and users, the government should instead legalize the use of marijuana and prepare profit from it by putting taxes on the sells of it. Should truth be told the government is just making marijuana traffickers richer by illegalizing it in spite of the fact that they could not really stop the use of marijuana no matter what they do. People still use marijuana in spite of it being illegal and the government is spending money on the prohibition of it without earning anything in return, thus, they must reverse their strategy and earn profits from marijuana and spend most of their time and resources on chasing the real harmful criminals such as killers, robbers, etc.ARGUMENT ON ADDICTION AND IGNORANCEThere are people who fight the legalization of marijuana to the extent. In spite of the medicinal uses of marijuana these people still do not wish to legalize it due to certain arguments like patients would rely more on marijuana to placate their pain instead of on normal medical procedures. This particular belief was mostly caused by their belief that marijuana is addicting. Just like all drugs they believe that marijuana is addicting and thus it would be hard to start once you started using it especially since it causes withdrawal syndromes. Additional factor is their belief that legalizing marijuana would heighten the numbers of people using it.The reason why many people turn against marijuana and why they dislike it so overmuch is mainly due to their ignorance. Many people views marijuana as addictive a nd they believe that it causes harmful effects on individuals. During the late 1930s marijuana was assumed to be some kind of a narcotic mainly because they were mostly used by people who use narcotics such as opium and the like without making any effort at all to dribble a research on the real effects of marijuana. The government well-tried to fight marijuana by being silent and giving jolty penalties believing that by doing so they could protect their youths from being corrupted by marijuana. However, silence resulted to ignorance resulting people to believe the worse on marijuana.As mentioned earlier people believed that marijuana is addictive. Yet a research conducted by Dr. Jack Henningfield and Dr. Neal Benowits proved that marijuana is not really addictive. They proved that cigarettes and alcohols are in fact more addicting than marijuana. It was also proven that marijuana does not cause any withdrawal syndromes on those people who wish to quit from using it (Wikman, 2000) . overly in regards to others belief that legalizing marijuana would increase the people using it, Holland would be the finest example to rebut that claim. Marijuana was already legalized in Holland since 1976 and since that time the number of people using marijuana decreased by 40%. opposite states in America which also legalized the use of marijuana did not put down any proof that legalizing marijuana would increase the number of people using it (Meiners, 2000).CONCLUSIONOverall this paper gave sufficient evidences that the legalization of marijuana would more likely cause positive effects on the society than negative ones. Study showed that marijuana is not really effective and that alcohol and nicotine is in fact more addictive and more harmful than marijuana. Also, anything in excess is bad and thus marijuana should be blamed for peoples misbehavior because even when someone does not smoke marijuana yet he drinks a lot then it would also surely cause harmful effects on that persons body. Another point is that not since you views something as distasteful it would also necessitate that that person would abide by your rules and would quit doing what he wants to do especially if it does not cause any harm on the society and on the individual living on it. The government should also focus their attentions more on more serious crimes than the fashion of marijuana. The government should also try to earn profit from the sells of marijuana to give way help the nation. Marijuana is nothing really serious especially if not taken in excess thus, marijuana ought to be legalized.ReferencesWikman, Eric. Legalization of Marijuana. 2000.Meiners, Roger E. The Legal Environment of Business Cincinnati Ohio South Western CollegePublishing, 2000.Weinstein, Sanford. The Educators go to Substance Abuse Prevention Mahwah, N.J.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated, 1999.